



Please click here to read our July edition and please click here to watch our video which introduces perfORM and each of our of core ODD services.
Our clients are global and diverse, including Investment Managers, Allocators (e.g., Family Offices/Multi-Family Offices, Private Banks, Wealth Managers, Funds of Funds, Asset Managers, Pension Funds, Endowments, Foundations), Third Party Service Providers and Sports Teams. Please contact us if you would like to discuss support, or to receive sample ODD Reports, thank you.
Our Co-Heads, James Newman & Quentin Thom will be in NYC w/c 21st September and would be pleased to meet, if timely and useful.
JTC and Permira Advisers LLP (“Permira”) announced that Permira’s £2.7 billion acquisition of JTC, by funds advised by Permira, alongside Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, has completed. The deal saw the company de-list from the London Stock Exchange and is now a private company.
We hope you enjoy our monthly e-bulletins and would like to continue receiving them. Please feel free to provide us with any feedback or comments. Should you wish to change your preferences or unsubscribe, please action per the links below. Thank you.
On 14 July the FCA published three linked consultations (CP26/26, CP26/27 and CP26/28), alongside HM Treasury publishing a draft statutory instrument that would transfer much of the detailed rulemaking responsibility for the UK AIFM regime to the FCA. Together, these proposals represent the most significant overhaul of UK fund regulation since the AIFMD rules were introduced in 2013. Their objective is to reinforce, post-Brexit, the UK’s position as a leading asset management jurisdiction by creating a regulatory framework that is more consistent, proportionate and less complex, while continuing to safeguard investor protection and market integrity.
Under CP26/28, most AIFM rules would be consolidated into a single FCA sourcebook. Currently a firm must be a full-scope AIFM if it manages more than €100m (including leverage) or €500m (unleveraged, with no redemption rights exercisable for five years), with thresholds measured using gross assets under management. Below those thresholds, a firm is a small AIFM — either authorised or, for a narrow group of managers, registered. The FCA would replace this with three tiers based on the aggregate net asset value of the AIFs a firm manages: small (below £750m), medium (£750m to £5bn) and large (above £5bn), with graduated requirements and numerous carve-outs for unleveraged closed-ended funds. Some noteworthy points:
CP26/26 proposes a streamlined reporting framework, FRAME, with ‘Essential’ requirements for AIFMs below £500m NAV and ‘Enhanced’ above. CP26/27 would merge the AIFM, UCITS and MIFIDPRU remuneration codes into one outcomes-focused regime, leaving decisions around deferral of bonuses largely to the firm’s management body.
The FCA extended the feedback deadlines for CP26/26 and CP26/28 to 22 October (although 18 September is deadline for CP26/28 discussion chapters). For CP26/27 the deadline remains 16 September.
The FCA currently expects final rules to be published in 2027, with implementation envisaged for 2028.
The FCA’s move towards a simpler and more proportionate rulebook is a positive development and, as noted by the regulator, could reduce low-value compliance activity and save the industry an estimated £128 million annually.
There is a potentially interesting effect from the proposed registration thresholds and the change of measurement basis. For new emerging managers, the lighter-touch regime itself becomes more demanding: valuation policies, liquidity management policies and annual stress testing would apply for the first time. Conversely, a manager running £500m of NAV with leverage is full-scope today but a small AIFM tomorrow resulting in removal of certain requirements, including the obligation to appoint a depositary.
As regulatory safeguards become more proportionate, investors may need to place greater reliance on operational due diligence to assess key non-investment risks. Areas such as asset verification, cash controls, service provider oversight and governance arrangements could become increasingly important when evaluating alternative asset managers that are subject to a lighter regulatory framework.